EU identifies 13 global critical mineral projects to support CRMA targets

The European Commission this week unveiled a list of 13 strategic critical mineral projects located outside the bloc that will benefit from coordinated financial support from European institutions, Member States, and lenders. The Commission will also help connect these projects to potential off-take partners in Europe.

It compliments alist of 47 strategic projects located within the European Union (EU), announced in March. Together, these projects represent an important step toward securing and diversifying the EU’s supply of critical mineral supply chains and will be fundamental in meeting the Critical Raw Materials Act’s (CRMA) target that the bloc should not rely on a single country for more than 65% of supply of any single strategic mineral.

According to the Commission, the newly selected projects will require a combined capital investment of €5.5 billion ($6.27 billion) to come to fruition. This comes in addition to the €22.5 billion ($24.3 billion) required for EU-based projects.

Where are the selected projects located?

Seven of the selected projects are located in Canada, Greenland, Kazakhstan, Norway, Serbia, Ukraine, Zambia, with whom the EU has signed strategic partnerships on critical minerals. The remaining projects are located in Brazil, Madagascar, Malawi, New Caledonia, South Africa, and the UK.

Notably, the inclusion of projects in Ukraine and Greenland also carries geopolitical implications for the EU’s relationship with the US. By selecting projects in these locations—Greenland and Ukraine for graphite, though notably not for Rare Earth Elements (REEs)—the EU is trying to assert itself into what the US increasingly considers its own geopolitical sphere, underscored by former President Trump’s aggressive resource diplomacy and rhetoric toward both regions.

Ten of the projects will center on extracting and processing battery raw minerals, while two projects aim to extract REEs to support the development of REE processing and Rare Earth Permanent Magnet (REPM) production capacity within the EU.

Risks to economic security arising from the concentration of global REE supply chains in China has come under increased scrutinysince it imposed export restrictions on medium and heavy REEs in April, a direct response to US President Donald Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.

Indeed, European automakers this week warned they could be forced to close factories within weeks due to a shortage of REPMs.

Can the EU meet its CRMA targets?

The EU is under pressure to fast-track critical mineral project timelines to meet its 2030 CRMA goals. Under current projections, Benchmark’s analysis illustrates that, aside from lithium and nickel mining, the bloc is set to fall short of its CRMA targets across each stage of the value chain.

This includes the requirement that, by 2030, domestic projects must meet 10% of mining, 40% of processing, and 25% of recycling of critical minerals to satisfy domestic demand.

Benchmark’s new newsletter, Mine to Grid Monthly, includes a roundup of policy highlights impacting new energy supply chain development.Sign up here to stay updated.

Related Content

“Ultimately, it’s about making sure that we keep real jobs here in Europe.” Q&A with the EU’s Peter Handley >

“Ultimately, it’s about making sure that we keep real jobs here in Europe.” Q&A with the EU’s Peter Handley

Last year the European Union introduced the Critical Raw Materials Act, the bloc’s first piece of legislation designed to boost supplies of critical minerals. Over the past year the EU has also signed strategic partnership agreements on raw materials with multiple countries, including Namibia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and – most recently – with […]

Benchmark opens public consultation on changes to its Sustainable Lithium and Sustainable Nickel grades >

Benchmark opens public consultation on changes to its Sustainable Lithium and Sustainable Nickel grades

Benchmark Mineral Intelligence announced today that it has started a formal consultation on changes to the sustainable lithium and sustainable nickel grades in its Lithium Price Assessment and Nickel Price Assessment Methodologies. Benchmark proposes to change the frequency of updates to its list of eligible producers, whose material can contribute to these grades, from quarterly […]